Skip to content
Warwickshire Counts — Warwickshire, in numbers.Local help →
Warwickshire Counts / Council areas / Rugby / Clifton, Newton and Churchover

Clifton, Newton and Churchover · Rugby

Clifton, Newton and Churchover: your neighbourhood

Clifton, Newton and Churchover electoral ward · May 2026 boundaries. Every figure carries its own date.

What stands out here?

Homes rented privately: 9% here, compared with 18% across Rugby (8.6 percentage points lower).

A larger private-rented sector changes the mix of housing advice, enforcement and tenant support needed. It does not tell us whether individual homes are affordable or safe.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent: 40.8% here, compared with 34.9% across Rugby (5.9 percentage points higher).

Qualifications show local skills, not whether people have secure jobs or use those skills at work.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages: 8.2% here, compared with 13.6% across Rugby (5.4 percentage points lower).

These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

The ward in numbers

People aged 65 or over

17.2%

21 March 2021 · Clifton, Newton and Churchover

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All usual residents

507 out of 2,945.

Source and method →

People reporting bad or very bad health

2.6%

21 March 2021 · Clifton, Newton and Churchover

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All usual residents; self-reported, not age-standardised

78 out of 2,946.

Source and method →

People counted in the census

2,946

21 March 2021 · Clifton, Newton and Churchover

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All usual residents

2,946 out of 2,946.

Source and method →

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent

40.8%

21 March 2021 · Clifton, Newton and Churchover

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

Residents aged 16 and over

951 out of 2,333.

Source and method →

Households facing at least one measured disadvantage

38.7%

21 March 2021 · Clifton, Newton and Churchover

The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

469 out of 1,212.

Source and method →

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages

8.2%

21 March 2021 · Clifton, Newton and Churchover

The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

99 out of 1,212.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ outside the labour market

31.5%

21 March 2021 · Clifton, Newton and Churchover

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

740 out of 2,346.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ in work

66.4%

21 March 2021 · Clifton, Newton and Churchover

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

1,557 out of 2,346.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ not working because of long-term illness or disability

1.6%

21 March 2021 · Clifton, Newton and Churchover

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

37 out of 2,346.

Source and method →

People aged 16+ with no qualifications

12.3%

21 March 2021 · Clifton, Newton and Churchover

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

Residents aged 16 and over

286 out of 2,333.

Source and method →

Homes rented privately

9%

21 March 2021 · Clifton, Newton and Churchover

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

114 out of 1,213.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ retired

21.2%

21 March 2021 · Clifton, Newton and Churchover

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

497 out of 2,346.

Source and method →

Homes rented from a council or housing association

13%

21 March 2021 · Clifton, Newton and Churchover

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

152 out of 1,213.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ unemployed

2.1%

21 March 2021 · Clifton, Newton and Churchover

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly. Unemployed residents as a share of all residents aged 16+; this is not the unemployment rate among economically active people.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

49 out of 2,346.

Source and method →

Crime and safety

Police-recorded locations for Clifton, Newton and Churchover ward. Locations are approximate; these are not all crimes or a measure of personal risk.

221 mapped crimes

September 2025 to August 2026. Compared with 155 in the previous 12 months. Anti-social behaviour is counted separately.

Mapped crime over time

September 2024 to August 2026

Clifton, Newton and Churchover ward · mapped crimes

Reviewed figures: September 2024 to August 2026. This reviewed record covers fewer than 30 years, so the chart opens on all of it.

Shown on this chart: 14 mapped crimes in September 2024; 25 mapped crimes in August 2026. These are recorded counts; check the coverage notes before comparing periods.

The line joins consecutive published observations.

Monthly crime and anti-social behaviour
Recorded locations by month · Clifton, Newton and Churchover
MonthMapped crimeAnti-social behaviour
September 2024141
October 2024230
November 2024160
December 2024170
January 202591
February 202561
March 2025101
April 202570
May 202592
June 2025174
July 2025212
August 202563
September 2025141
October 2025122
November 2025194
December 2025263
January 2026172
February 2026121
March 202692
April 2026243
May 2026201
June 2026158
July 2026284
August 2026255
Crime categories in the latest complete year
September 2025 to August 2026 · Clifton, Newton and Churchover
CategoryMapped crimes
other theft81
violent crime77
criminal damage arson16
vehicle crime16
public order14
burglary6
drugs4
other crime4
possession of weapons1
bicycle theft1
robbery1
What these numbers include

Approximate published locations, not every crime or personal risk.

Anti-social behaviour is separate. Transport police and unusable locations excluded.

An empty ward count means no mapped rows in the complete required force files; it does not prove that no crime occurred.

These are retrieved mapped records, not a guarantee of complete crime reporting. Approximate locations and unmapped incidents limit comparisons.

Missing ward-months invalidate totals and changes. Busy centres attract visitors, so residential population is not a measure of the number of people exposed.

Police data and method →

What could improve local safety →

Projects and proposed responses

A nearby project is not proof of a benefit to the whole ward. Only source-supported ward links are attached here.

No project boundary has been verified against this ward. See projects and their stated locations →

Proposed responses across Rugby →